Typological Damage Fragility Curves for Unreinforced Masonry Buildings affected by the 2009 L'Aquila, Italy Earthquake
نویسندگان
چکیده
Background: Seismic risk mitigation has become a crucial issue due to the great number of casualties and large economic losses registered after recent earthquakes. In particular, unreinforced masonry constructions built before modern seismic codes, common in Italy other seismic-prone areas, are characterized by vulnerability. order implement policies, analytical tools necessary generate scenario simulations. Methods: Therefore, data collected during inspections 2009 L’Aquila, earthquake used derive novel fragility functions. Compared previous studies, interpreted accounting for presence buildings not inspected those being undamaged. An innovative building damage state is proposed based on response different structural elements recorded survey form: vertical structures, horizontal stairs, roof, partition walls. suggested formulation, combination their performance weighted typical reparation techniques relative size elements, estimated from database complete geometrical surveys developed specifically this study. Moreover, estimates earthquake-related removing preexisting reported inspection form. Results: Lognormal curves, terms grade as function typological classes peak ground acceleration, derived maximizing likelihood merits compared with studies highlighted. Conclusion: The correction account uninspected delivers curves that less “stiff” reach median lower acceleration values. feature influences most quality.
منابع مشابه
Study on Earthquake Damage Distribution of Multistory Masonry Buildings
The main components which affect the earthquake damage grades classification of multistory masonry buildings and the damage characters are summarized and analyzed through the statistics and analysis of a large number of previous earthquake damage data. According to the standard of earthquake damage grades classification, the damage numbers of each component of multistory masonry buildings under...
متن کاملDamage Accumulation in Unreinforced Masonry Due to Seismic Loading
Masonry has low cohesive strength and is susceptible to the brittle failure, when subjected to induced tensile stresses. It fails due to lateral tensile stresses even when masonry prisms are tested in uni-axial static compression and the stress-strain curve remains almost linear up to failure. Although masonry normally resists compressive forces, under lateral in-plane cyclic loads some parts o...
متن کاملFlexural Tension in Unreinforced Masonry
Unreinforced masonry is that in which the tensile strength of the masonry is taken into consideration in design. Allowable out-of-plane tensile stress values are a function of the mortar type, such as Portland cement/lime mortar vs. masonry cement mortar or type M or S mortar vs. type N mortar. The allowable tensile stress is also a function of the masonry construction, such as tension parallel...
متن کاملTesting unreinforced masonry structures at reduced scale
When testing multi-story structures on a shaking table, most testing facilities require a reduced scale model. Producing scale test units at small scale is particularly challenging for unreinforced masonry structures. Previous work by other researchers showed that scaling of units and mortar joints is mandatory in order to obtain for the reduced scale masonry failure modes, which are similar to...
متن کاملEffective stiffness of unreinforced brick masonry walls
Code design of Unreinforced Masonry (URM) buildings is based on elastic analysis, which requires as input parameter the effective stiffness of URM walls. Current approaches estimate the effective stiffness as fixed ratio of the gross sectional stiffness but comparisons with experimental results have shown that this does not yield satisfactory predictions. In this paper, a recently developed ana...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: The Open Civil Engineering Journal
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['1874-1495']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/1874149502115010117